YouTube - serwis internetowy umożliwiający publikację w internecie filmów, wideoklipów lub własnych mini produkcji, reklamujący się hasłem "Broadcast Yourself" (ang. "Niech inni cię zobaczą", a w dosłownym tłumaczeniu - "Pokaż siebie"). Jest on otwarty, więc każdy odwiedzający może wysłać swój film na stronę. Serwis ma ogromny potencjał wypromowania oryginalnych postaci i przedsięwzięć.
YouTube zaczynało jako strona, której treścią były filmy przedstawiające kota autora. Obecnie YouTube jest największym serwisem udostępniającym tego typu usługi, a właściciele utworzyli spółkę (YouTube, Inc.).
Według Google, dziennie na YouTube umieszczanych jest ponad 70 tys. filmów, zajmujących ok. 1400 GB = 1,4 TB.
Podobne wpisy
Why Homosexuality Should Be Banned
TOP 12 REASONS WHY GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD BE ILLEGAL
The Cost of Same-Sex Marriage
Gay Marriage: End of the world for some Christians
Why Gay Marriage is WRONG
Debate on Same Sex Marriage
Sykes on gay Marriage
Ellen Degeneres Vs. John McCain: Gay Marriage
Do you support same-sex marriage?
What Canadians think about same-sex marriage debate
Ex-Gay Marriage Miracle Cure
Youtube debate gay marriage question
Gay Marriage: what's the big screaming deal?
Fox News Spins Gay Marriage Ruling in O'Reilly No Spin Zone?
The Gay Marriage Thing
Bill Maher - Gay Marriage commentary [near Christmas 2003]
REPENT SINNERS! - Gay Marriage in CA (anti Prop 8!)
Homophobia Is Gay
Anti-Gay Marriage Petition Fraud Caught on Camera
Clinton on Ellen discussing gay marriage
Tearful Republican reverses his stance against gay marriage
Gay Marriage Debate - Fresno CA
Gay Marriage - Toby Hargrave- Comedy Now
Do you support gay marriage?
The Situation - Same-sex Marriage
Komentarze
| Gay Marriage is seen as taboo to those who were teenagers in the 50's and 60's. There's nothing wrong with it. For some it's a choice, for others it's natural (they grew up like it). And the whole anal being unnatural? (Going to be crude now). I hear so much about straight men wanting to give Anal to girls, or have fingers up their asses... >.>... These straight men are insecure and protecting their 'sexuality'.. God have the balls lol Gay people should have same rights. | dxvejust |
| Maybe we should start up the eugenics program too, so idiots like yourself can't keep having offspring | WesByNorthWest |
| All gays do is make sarcastic videos and protest. I truely hope somebody would start up another holocaust and kill every last won of them, male and female. | giuseppeow |
| for all the homo haters are you against slavery? in the bible it says slavery is okay...hmm? | blahlikewhoa |
| What about bisexuality or flex sex? | Rilwankujenya |
| haha i liked the humping stickmen, cool video made 10 HIGHLY relevant points | tabeetz |
| if the majority was to agree with marriage being between two people or about "love" then fine but as of now it isnt that way so it wont be changed, and if it is it shouldnt lol It's odd or whateverbut ack you know | Sword142 |
| Being gay isn't natural it is a choice.. even unconciously.. or maybe a genetic mix up, but the simple fact that it takes a male and female to reproduce means that males and females were meant to be together... heterosexuality is the natural. If you want to argue that even With the unaturalness it is acceptable then sure but no,marriage the deffinition shouldn't be changed becuase of a few "new radical" ideas | Sword142 |
| I love this!!! Especially the part about "the theocracy of America" I'm Christian and I support gay marriage. | juicyjuiceme |
| I think for the while she should try New Hampshire or Connecticut, I think those are the two states that allow it. California is not far behind; our better half is in uproar and I can see the stupidity of the proponents of Prop 8 overturned by this time next year. | draccataura |
| Since marriage is not just about love, that's the problem with viewpoint like this one. The symbol of Marriage is between one man, one woman before God in holy matrimony to protect the family strucure and provide an avenue to further the species. Just because some married couple may not be able to have kids for physical reasons(although in principle the possibility is there between a man and a woman and never with the same sex) doesn't change the definition of marriage. | BattleCry4Him |
| "REAL MEN are confident enough in their own sexual identity that they don't need to put down others sexuality based on they're sexual preferences." Well said. | MCH1984 |
| I never said I didn't like it, I was actually defending it with facts. Several of my friends are gay, and I wish it was legal in Oklahoma, because one of my friends wants to get married to her girlfriend. | AenimaDeathGod003292 |
| homosexuality is natural. if you don't like gay marriage, then why don't you marry someone of the opposite sex? | byrthfood |
| When you think about it, homosexuality is kind of natural to an animalistic instinct. Humans are animals(because we are mammals), and same gendered animals also try to have sex. In history, long before Christianity was made, homosexuality was encouraged. in Sparta, when the soldiers went off to war, most of the civilians and soldiers were bisezual, because it was illegal not to have sex, and also to encourage child birth for a bigger population, resulting in a stronger military. | AenimaDeathGod003292 |
| And if children can't be produced, then it will be a big problem. Human race will no longer to exist if everyone in this world is homosexual. But luckily most of us are straight. But I think unatural things will never become "the most population" simply because they're unatural. So I think homosexual doesn't have to be banned cuase they'll never become "most of us". They have their rights to become unatural, no need to bother. | ffoecaf2006 |
| Wow thats amazing! I know I can change my DNA sporadically whenever I want. That is why I can be white one day, black then next, and I can even grow fingers from my forehead! | tehgay11111 |
| Oh really? You can choose your sexuality? Then please enlighten me on how because I am sick of being ridiculed for that. Since you seem to know exactly what every single homosexual person in the entire world is going through we should all go to you for guidance. And you must have been born a long time ago to have personally lived in the times when slavery was legal. Why don't you stop taking that out on the people of today when it wasn't anyone here that caused slavery to start with? | tehgay11111 |
| Sorry, that was supposed to go on someone else's post but I can't quite seem how to figure out how to get it there XD | tehgay11111 |
| Wow.... Thats...untrue. Marriage was created before some idiot thought up Christianity, the Christians just seem to think they thought up some brilliant idea that isn't already ingrained into human instinct. Amazing! I don't know how these damn Christians got so smart, suddenly telling everyone that they are wrong even though Romans had same-sex flings way before people started getting "married"! Thank "GOD" we have people like them to tell us how to live our lives. | tehgay11111 |
| i started to call you an ass hole untill i read the caption things | goldmenthol |
| No, REAL MEN are confident enough in their own sexual identity that they don't need to put down others sexuality based on they're sexual preferences. Real Men don't need to insult and demean other men for their preferences of the same gender. REAL MEN have confidence in their masculinity enough to know that they do not need to return another man's attraction to them and don't need to denigrate that individual's attraction to them at the same time. | BriareosHecatonchire |
| Marriage, and the contractual obligations therein in the past has always been about the financial protection of any children that should arise from the union of two partners (usually a man and woman). Given that unless adoption is ruled out (in the cases of two men) or that adoption or in-vitro fertilization and impregnation is ruled out (in cases involving two women) the propagation of children is otherwise impossible, the details of such yearly renewable marriage contracts should be as prenups | BriareosHecatonchire |
| I think you might be onto something...however those short term contracts would only create more split households...everyone argues and at some point the contract and those arguments will coincide! I prefer to make Marriage stronger and more unbreakable...not just a lust thing! The idea i read from another poster was that couples should blend assets, investments and debts! I would take it further and say have only One Checking, Savings account in both names! | RecceMan90 |
| Easy solution to prevent the need for more lawyers and still allow same-sex marriages; have both parties sign one year marriage contracts, that can be renewed on a yearly basis should the love still exist or allowed to be annulled by not renewing at the end of each year should there be no more love present. | BriareosHecatonchire |
